Page 14 - Journal 89-3 Full
P. 14

Rationale
                                In an effort to address the high rate of teacher attrition and assist novice special
                             education teachers in their first years of teaching, many districts provide mentor
                             teachers for their novice teachers (Cornelius & Sandmel, 2018; Goldhaber et al.,
                             2020). These experienced mentors are usually working teachers and, ideally, are
                             working in the same or similar environment as the novice teacher (Wexler, 2020).
                             Mentors and mentees work closely together in activities such as meeting regularly,
                             observing each other’s classrooms, sharing lesson ideas and classroom management
        Dr. Cynthia Rollins   strategies, and providing site support in many diverse, non-teaching areas such as
        Spangler completed   using the copier, managing paperwork and information, writing goals, and conducting
        her EdD at Northcentral
        University and is a   IEP meetings (Biggers et al., 2019; Weisling & Gardiner, 2018). The importance of
        program specialist and   quality mentorship has been established (Cornelius & Sandmel, 2018), but research
        special educator. A   is lacking in what leads to a positive and effective mentor-mentee pairing (Biggers
        member of DKG since   et al., 2019; Kwok et al., 2021; Lozinak, 2016; Mitchell et al., 2020).
        2017, she is a past vice
        president for Iota Nu                            Problem and Purpose
        Chapter in California
        State Organization.     The problem addressed in this qualitative case study was the lack of effective
        Spangler received a   mentorship  and  the  influence  such  a  gap  may  have  on  novice  special  education
        scholarship from her state   teachers’ perceived level of job satisfaction. The purpose of this qualitative case
        organization to assist   study was to identify the factors that special education mentors and novice teachers
        in funding her doctoral   perceived as leading to a positive pairing in an induction program and to consider
        studies.
                             how pairing impacts perceived job satisfaction. Understanding what makes a positive
        cspangler59@gmail.com  mentor-mentee relationship from the perspective of both the mentee and the mentor
                             is important to the satisfaction of the novice teacher and to a lower rate of turnover
                             in the first years of the novice teacher’s career. The results of this study furthered
                             the understanding of positive pairings for novice and experienced special education
                             teachers, which may result in a higher level of teacher satisfaction and a lower level
                             of teacher attrition.


                             Research Questions
                             The study answered three research questions:
                                  •  What are novice teachers’ perceptions of the factors that lead to a positive
                                    mentor-mentee relationship?
                                  •  What are mentor teachers’ perceptions of the factors that lead to a positive
                                    mentor-mentee relationship?
                                  •  Does  the  mentor-mentee  pairing  have  a  perceived  impact  on  a  novice
                                    teacher’s job satisfaction?

                             Population and Sample
                                The  population  of  this  study  was  comprised  of  teachers  and  administrators
                             who were participating in or had participated in the induction program in one rural
                             community in southern California in the 5 years prior to the study. A sample of
                             12 special educators and administrators with first-hand knowledge of the induction
                             program  was  recruited  via  district  email.  Participants  included  novice  teachers
                             (“mentees”) who were in or had graduated from the program to work toward earning
                             their clear credential or participated in the program as mentees in the prior 5 years;
                             mentor teachers who were paired with mentees and provided support throughout
                             the 2-year program; and coordinators who administered the program through the
                             county office of education. This was a viable number of participants for a qualitative


        12                                           The Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin: International Journal for Professional Educators
   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19