Page 24 - Journal 89-3 Full
P. 24

al.,  2022),  the  navigation  of  technology-mediated  human  connection  (Henrikson
                             et al., 2022), and the increased responsibility placed on teachers to care for their
                             students (Robinson et al., 2022), particularly as schools struggle to find qualified
                             school nurses, psychologists, and counselors (Whitaker et al., 2019). The current
                             reality of K–12 schooling demands that teacher preparation programs equip teachers
                             to manage their increased responsibility emotionally in a way that protects their own
                             well-being and alleviates the likelihood of professional burnout.


        Dr. Karyn E. Miller is an       An Opposing Viewpoint and the Counter-Argument
        assistant professor at
        Texas A&M University-   Despite the importance of teacher well-being, one could argue that foregrounding
        Commerce in the      teacher SEL (a) will place an unnecessary strain on already limited school resources
        Department of Curriculum   and (b) prioritizes a politically charged, philosophical perspective that runs counter
        and Instruction. Her   to  the  purpose  of  schooling,  particularly  as  defined  by  accountability  policies.
        research focuses on   Economists argue that public education funding in the United States is inequitable
        school culture, gender   and insufficient (Allegretto et al., 2022). The underinvestment in education leaves
        and leadership, education
        policy, and teacher   many districts unprepared and without the resources to respond to emergency or
        preparation. Dr. Miller has   unexpected circumstances (Allegretto et al., 2022). Amid the pandemic, districts
        published in numerous   reallocated resources to fund infrastructure and ventilation updates, student safety,
        journals, including   and remote learning technology, mostly funded by an influx of federal dollars (Bryant
        Teachers’ College Record,   et al., 2022). As districts struggle to address learning losses, spending priorities have
        Comparative Education   focused on tutoring, extended school days, summer school, and funds for support
        Review, Online Learning,
        and Gender, Work, &   staff and professional development (Lobosco, 2021). Yet, federal stimulus is short-
        Organization.        lived, comes with restrictions, and fails to address the systemic issues of underfunded
                             public schools (Allegretto et al., 2022) that force districts to invest in immediate
        Karyn.Miller@tamuc.edu  needs, such as resources and infrastructure, rather than allocating funding to long-
                             term institutional planning like the inclusion of SEL programming (Osher & Berg,
                             2017).
                                Arguably, SEL, particularly for teachers, is simply not a feasible spending priority
                             for many districts (Lobosco, 2021). Even if it were, SEL has become a politically
                             charged point of contention with parents, schools, and states fighting to keep it out
                             of the curriculum (Anderson, 2022; Becky & Marley, 2021). SEL has been targeted
                             as worthless, unnecessary, and dangerous and is even considered brainwashing by
                             some groups (Kingkade & Hixenbaugh, 2021).
                                We  address  each  of  these  opposing  viewpoints  in  turn.  The  argument  that
                             cost is an impediment to supporting teacher SEL must be considered within the
                             broader context of teacher turnover. According to The Learning Policy Institute, it
                             costs districts roughly $20,000–$30,000 for each teacher who leaves the profession
                             and  an  annual  total  of  approximately  $8.5  billion  nationally  (Hillard,  2022).  In
                             contrast,  estimates  suggest  that  schools  and  districts  spend  approximately  $640
                             million annually on SEL products and programs (Krachman & Larocca, 2017). The
                             focus of these programs is largely student SEL rather than teacher SEL. However,
                             systematic and holistic SEL initiatives, such as CASEL’s partnerships with school
                             districts, can support teacher and student SEL in relatively cost-effective ways. On
                             their website, CASEL (n.d.) provides sample budgets from three participants in their
                             “Collaborating  District  Initiative.”  One  lower-cost  model  budgets  approximately
                             $40,500, or $3 per student served, for district-wide SEL programming that includes
                             adult  SEL  development.  Support  for  novice  teachers’  SEL  development  may  be
                             particularly important for building a sense of belonging and mitigating early-career
                             challenges (Flushman et al., 2021).


        22                                           The Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin: International Journal for Professional Educators
   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29