Page 50 - 2024_Jour_90-5
P. 50

Finding Community Allies for Social Studies:

                  A Case Study on Little Free Libraries



                                   By Amber J. Godwin and Abbie R. Strunc


          The authors report on a limited longitudinal case study developed to understand the role and potential role of
          community-based Little Free Libraries in encouraging discourse about key topics in social studies. Using a qualitative
          phenomenological research design based on van Dijk’s (2016) socio-cognitive perspective, they sought to explore
          the reading behaviors of residents of a planned suburban neighborhood in a state in the southwest United States.
          Data suggested that Little Free Libraries can provide important content to participants, particularly in a context of
          restriction of social studies materials in schools.

                                tate legislative bodies in Texas, among several other of the United States, have
                            Spassed new laws recently that have not only limited social studies content but
                             have also banned books with social studies themes (National Council for the Social
                             Studies,  2021).  As  lawmakers  have  removed  two  pathways  for  engagement  in
                             social studies content, adolescents are missing out on the opportunity to develop
                             “historical ideas, attachments, and identities” (Levesque & Croteau, 2022, p. 120)
                             and to fulfill what teachers hope for: “growing literate beings who are competent and
                             confident” (Leland et al., 2012, p. 60). This study was conducted to discover ways
                             in which books moved through a Little Free Library (LFL) and, by extension, how
                             community members who live around the LFL were interacting by sharing fiction
                             and nonfiction books with each other, specifically social studies content in fiction and
                             nonfiction books. This study is important because finding examples of social studies
                             interactions through shared LFL books could indicate that the mindsets these works
                             incorporate are being explored despite policies produced to control the dominant
                             discourse of social studies.

                                                              Background
                                The LFL movement changed access to reading materials and sought to provide
                             more books in book deserts in more than 100 countries with free-standing structures
                             where countless numbers of books are exchanged—with the central goal of providing
                             access to different kinds of books for all readers (Fuentes, 2018; Shachar, 2018).
                             According to the LFL website (2023), this 501(c)(3) nonprofit
                                    is a “take a book, share a book” free book exchange. They come in many
                                    shapes and sizes, but the most common version is a small wooden box of
                                    books. Anyone may take a book or bring a book to share. Little Free Library
                                    book exchanges have a unique, personal touch. There is an understanding
                                    that real people are sharing their favorite books with their community; little
                                    libraries have been called “mini-town squares.”
                             The  community  spaces  provided  by  LFLs  allow  for  a  “championing  of  diverse
                             books”  and  provide  opportunities  for  “collaboration”  within  communities  (LFL,
                             2023).  This  research  project  emerged  from  curiosity  regarding  the  impact  and
                             potential cultural imprint created intentionally or unintentionally by LFLs. Some
                             have expressed concern about the kinds of books found in LFLs for reasons that
                             range from ideological “seeding” (Capps, 2017) to zoning laws (Associated Press
                             State Wire, 2015). However, others are in favor of the LFLs as is indicated by their
                             participation in the book exchanges and even the building of their own LFLs. The



        48                                           The Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin: International Journal for Professional Educators
   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55