Page 23 - 2024_Mag_90-4
P. 23

Viewpoint





        The message: DKG is in trouble
        because our membership numbers
        are decreasing. We must look for new
        prospective members.

            The  Avenue  M  study  shows  challenges  of
        recruiting  new  members  who  indicated  they  are
        familiar with DKG. Most of these women surveyed
        cited many personal and professional reasons for
        not joining. Membership in DKG was not valuable
        to them. Accordingly, the data suggested we should
        not focus on working to convince those who have
        heard of DKG that membership has value.
            More importantly, we need to reach prospective
        members who have never heard about our Society.
        What  was  really  disappointing  in  the Avenue  M
        study was the lack of survey information relative to such potential members. We need to understand and
        respond to the key challenges of recruiting new prospective members: they need to know what and who
        we are.


        The message: DKG is in trouble because our membership numbers are plunging.
        Is public perception a problem?
            Because the Avenue M study says little about how others perceive DKG, we must rely on anecdotal
        information. Many members have a story of trying to describe DKG to a prospective member or a person
        from the general public and hearing their response: “Oh, you are a sorority.” By the time one gets around
        to explaining “No, we are a society,” the listener has moved on. One reference in the Avenue M study
        refers to the negativity associated with the sorority image and how a name change might be a solution. A
        name change could open the door to significant recognition and more favorable public perception. A more
        meaningful and recognizable name will translate into easier recruitment of prospective members.

        The message:  DKG is in trouble because our membership numbers are alarming.
        Marketing strategies with rebranding could be helpful.
            As many members know, the idea that rebranding will enhance marketing efforts is not a new one.
        The process of considering changing the DKG name started in 2016 at the International Convention
        in Nashville when British Columbia State Organization presented its proposed amendment to the DKG
        Constitution and ISRs. This proposal was defeated. A name change was then proposed again in 2018 in
        Austin, Texas—and was again defeated, but by a smaller margin. The amendment was resubmitted in
        2020, but the DKG International Convention in Philadelphia was cancelled due to COVID. In 2022, the
        proposal was resubmitted again for the DKG International Convention in New Orleans but fell to the floor
        because of time constraints. The DKG Administrative Board recommended approval of these proposed
        amendments each time they were submitted.

                                                    The Proposal
            DKG  British  Columbia  State  Organization  has  again  submitted  a  name  change  proposal  for  the
        Constitution and ISRs to be presented at the DKG International Convention in National Harbor, Maryland,
        in 2024. The proposed name is “International Society of Women Educators (DKG).” The proposers
        believe the Society needs a name that shows clearly where, what, and who we are. We know that we



                                                                                     Collegial Exchange  ·  21
   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28