Page 57 - 2022-Jour_88-3_FINAL
P. 57

to  hear  multiple  perspectives. After  teaching  and  studying  issues,  teachers  have
            opinions—even if they are not popular in the community. Teachers should work to
            make their opinions acceptable to listeners and use autonomy and respect with their
            students if they are presenting unpopular perspectives.


                                              References
            Adams, D. (2021, May 11). What we know about the critical race theory controversy,
                   impact on Indiana education. Indianapolis Star. https://www.indystar.com/story/
                   news/education/2021/05/11/what-critical-race-theory-heres-why-its-controversial-
                   indiana/5035542001/

            Associated Press. (2021, May 6). Arizona bill banning ‘biased’ topics in schools advances.
                   https://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/arizona-bill-banning-biased-topics-schools-
                   advances-77543503
            Beck, T. A. (2019). Managing an unpopular opinion in a controversial political issue discussion.
                   Theory and Research in Social Education, 47(2), 205–227.
            Block, C. R. (2019). Educator affect: LGBTQ in social studies curriculum. Critical Questions in
                   Education, 10(1), 1–16.

            Conrad, J. (2020). Navigating identity as a controversial issue: One teacher’s disclosure for critical
                   empathic reasoning. Theory and Research in Social Education, 48(2), 211–243.

            Erlich, R. R., & Gindi, S. (2019). Are civics teachers different from teachers of other disciplines in
                   their handling of controversial issues? Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, 14(2),
                   118–130.
            Hamblin, D., & Bartlett, M. J. (2013). Navigating social networks. Educational Leadership, 70(6),
                   44–47.
            Indiana Department of Education. (2021). Core 40 general information. https://www.in.gov/doe
                   /students/indiana-academic-standards/core-40-general-information/

            Kawashima-Ginsberg, K., & Junco, R. (2018). Teaching controversial issues in a time of
                   polarization. Social Education, 82(6), 323–329.

            Khan, M. (2019). When does free speech become offensive speech? Teaching controversial issues
                   in classrooms. Curriculum and Teaching Dialogue, 21(1), 35–50.

            King, L. J., Vickery, A. E., & Caffrey, G. (2018). A pathway to racial literacy: Using the LETS ACT
                   framework to teach controversial issues. Social Education, 82(6), 316, 318–320, 322.

            Linowes, D., Ho, L.-C., Misco, T., & Stahlsmith, M. (2019). Exploring controversial issues in
                   elementary social studies. Journal of International Social Studies, 9(2), 35–55.

            Lintner, T. (2018). The controversy over controversy in the social studies classroom. SRATE
                   Journal, 27(1), 14–21. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1166700.pdf
            National Council for the Social Studies. (2013). College, career, and civic fife (C3) framework
                   for social studies state standards: Guidance for enhancing the rigor of K–12 civics,
                   economics, geography, and history. Author.

            National Council for the Social Studies. (2010). National curriculum standards for social studies: A
                   framework for teaching, learning, and assessment. Author.

            Reynolds, H. M., Silvernell, D., & Mercer, F. (2020). Teaching in an era of political divisiveness:
                   An exploration of strategies for discussing controversial issues. Clearing House: A Journal
                   of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 93(4), 205–212.



            Educators’ Choice                                                                                  55
   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62