Page 29 - 2022-Jour_88-5
P. 29

development of our students’ praxis and self-efficacy in mind. In the peak of the
            pandemic, our local public school partners shifted to a hybrid classroom model in
            which approximately half of the students attended class in person while the rest
            logged in remotely.  With social distancing and room capacity restrictions in place,
            we had to develop creative alternate opportunities for  our students to engage in
            teaching opportunities and find ways to provide targeted feedback.  As such, our
            instructional team explored the idea of implementing microteaches to supplement
            the reduced time in field. A microteach is a lesson taught in front of peers for the   Dr. Paula Jakopovic
            purpose of practice and peer review, including written feedback. In our program,   is Assistant Professor
            the microteach was also observed by an instructor who provided additional written   of Early Childhood and
                                                                                              Elementary Mathematics
            feedback.                                                                         at the University of
                                                                                              Nebraska at Omaha. Her
            Shifting the Structure Mid-Pandemic                                               research interests include
               In  fall  2020,  our  instructional  team  decided  to  facilitate  five  microteaching   teacher preparation,
            opportunities  spread  across  the  6-week  field  experience.  In  these  opportunities,   instructional coaching,
            students facilitated a portion of a planned lesson to a group of peers and received   STEM education, and
                                                                                              the recruitment and
            feedback from both an instructor and the peer group. Our team selected each week’s   retention of mathematics
            topic to ensure students engaged in similar concepts and disciplines while allowing  teachers. She serves as
            each student the choice of grade level and targeted learning objective for his or her  co-principal investigator
            plan.                                                                             and senior personnel on
               Our  teacher  preparation  program  uses  the  Interstate  Teacher  Assessment   several National Science
            and  Support  Consortium  (InTASC)  performance  standards  to  guide  instructors’   Foundation grants aimed
                                                                                              at the improvement of
            observations and feedback as they evaluate each student’s overall performance during   mathematics teaching
            the practicum experience (Council of Chief State School Officers [CCSSO], 2013).  in both K–12 and higher
            These standards, constructed by the CCSSO, outline what teachers should know and  education. She is also the
            be able to do to ensure all PK–12 students reach their potential and are college and   current associate editor of
            career ready. With an awareness that our students had limited mastery experiences   the Journal of Mathematics
            within which to demonstrate these competencies during the condensed practicum     Education Leadership.
                                                                                              paulajakopovic@
            experience,  we  focused  each  microteach  on  a  different  performance  standard.   unomaha.edu
            Students facilitated opportunities for their peers to engage with the learning objective
            during 15-minute microteach presentations. While each student presented, his or her
            small group of peers actively participated as learners and took notes to assist in
            providing meaningful feedback to the presenter at the conclusion of the microteach.
            After each presentation, both the instructor and participating peers offered targeted
            feedback. We encouraged each participant to provide both positive and constructive
            feedback centered on the designated performance standard. Although peers provided
            solely verbal feedback, the instructors gave both oral and written feedback. After the
            reflective conversation, each student also engaged in self-reflection, documenting
            aspects of the lesson that went well, identifying things to consider, and setting a goal
            for moving forward.


            Reactions to the Initial Implementation
               At the close of the semester, we asked students to complete a written reflection
            about the microteach experience and interviewed each of the instructors to examine
            what worked well and to solicit areas for improvement. Students and instructors
            both identified varied aspects of the microteach experiences that were beneficial.
               Both  students  and  instructors  agreed  that  mastery  experiences  to  engage  in
            targeted practice planning for and implementing the InTASC standards (CCSSO,
            2013)  was  beneficial.  Both  groups  pointed  out  that  these  opportunities  resulted


            Schools Fostering a More Equitable World                                                           27
   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34