Page 9 - 2025_Magazine_91-4
P. 9

Features





        What is the difference between revision and amendment?

           ...Amendments                      governing documents,  but the terms have distinct  meanings
                                                 Both  amendment  and  revision  refer  to  making  changes  to


                 are minor                    (Jennings,  2016).  An  amendment  involves  making  “specific,
                                              targeted changes” to a few sections of the documents. In contrast,
             adjustments,                     a revision entails completely  replacing  the existing document
                                              with  a  new,  substantially  rewritten  document,  usually  due

           while a revision                   to  “significant  changes  that  affect  the  entire  structure”  of  the
                                              organization (Jennings, 2016, para. 6). Essentially,  amendments
                                              are minor adjustments, while a revision signifies a major overhaul.
          signifies a major                   Basically, a revision substitutes a new document for the existing
                                              one. A revision represents an extensive rewrite that may include
                 overhaul.                    fundamental changes to the organization’s structure, which might
                                              result in changes to how DKG  operates, including governance,
                                              membership, decision-making, voting, and more.


        Why choose revision over amendment?

            As organizations evolve,  certain  language  in governing
        documents may become outdated,  making  revision  necessary.      It has been more
        There are several reasons for revising our governing documents,
        including  (a) comprehensive  review  and  analysis, (b)        than 15 years since
        simplification, and (c) time considerations.
            Comprehensive  review  and analysis:  Choosing
        to revise the governing documents allows assessment and              the governing
        evaluation of every article and section. Stout (2024) revealed that
        one of the “usual best practices” suggested by many association   structure of DKG
        management leaders is to do a “governance review from time to
        time” (p.16). It has been more than 15 years since the governing     has been fully
        structure of DKG has been fully revised, making this a prime
        time to review and analyze our governing documents to help
        identify any outdated provisions and address any potential gaps.   revised, making
            Simplification:  Streamlined  governing  documents are
        crucial as they provide a clear, concise, and efficient description    this a prime
        of governance structure that enables an organization to operate
        smoothly. The simplification of our governing documents will
        decrease  possible misinterpretations  and  assist  in  clarification   time to review
        between governing processes and operational processes. GAPP
        will bring the guidelines, policies, and procedures together in        and analyze
        one place and out of the Constitution and International Standing
        Rules.  Creating  and maintaining  this policy  framework will       our governing
        be  an  evolving  process,  continuously  and  fluidly  adapting  to
        the  organization’s changing  needs.  As new  circumstances  or
        challenges arise, additional policies or procedures may be needed.    documents...
        For instance, the recent introduction of the DKG Code of Ethics



                                                                                      Collegial Exchange  ·  7
   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14