Page 13 - 2025_Magazine_91-4

Features

In truth, both the current Constitution and International Standing Rules contain many operational pieces
and provisions that will be transferred to GAPP, where they can be updated more efficiently and effectively
through the administrative and executive boards. As noted by Takagi (2015), provisions that require more
frequent modification “belong in a separate board-approved document” (para. 6) instead of a governing
document. As explained by the 2024–2026 International Parliamentarian Helen Popovich, “The Task
Force will need to weed out any policies and procedures that don’t fit into the bylaws and move them to
GAPP” (personal communication, November 4, 2024). By adopting a streamlined document structure,
members can more easily locate the information they need, whether it pertains to governance (bylaws) or
operational matters (GAPP).

Will members lose their voice if we convert to Bylaws and GAPP?

Members will continue to have the opportunity to
DKG will be influence decisions regarding both the bylaws and GAPP. The
process of amending the International Bylaws will mirror
more adaptive and that used to change the current governing documents: Any

member, committee, board, chapter, or state organization
forward-thinking, can submit a proposed amendment for formal consideration
by the membership. For GAPP, the process of amendment

as well as better is already included in the current Constitution (Article XVI,
Section D.2; DKG, 2024, p. C-35). Any member, committee,
board, chapter, or state organization can recommend changes
prepared to navigate by filling out a GAPP Request for Change Form. This
completed form will be submitted to the administrative board
a fast-paced, for review. Any amendment to GAPP deemed viable will be
presented to the international executive board for a vote. A
majority vote from the executive board will be required for
changing world... approval. Once approved, amendments to GAPP will take
effect immediately or as soon as feasible.
This process of modifying GAPP will allow for quicker
adaptations compared to the longer timelines for amending the Constitution (2 years) and the International
Standing Rules (1 year). By enabling more rapid changes in practices, the Society can continuously respond
to new challenges and opportunities. This dynamic approach will help ensure that our organization remains
relevant and supports long-term success, avoiding stagnation caused by slower decision making. This
streamlined process will allow us to address inefficiencies as they arise rather than waiting 1 to 2 years for
amendments. DKG will be more adaptive and forward-thinking, as well as better prepared to navigate a
fast-paced, changing world by making incremental changes as needed rather than waiting for delayed and
long-term periods of time.

Why should we involve an attorney during the revision process?

Involving an attorney in the revision process is fundamental because, like the Constitution, the
International Bylaws will serve as a legal document. It is vital to seek assistance from a qualified expert.
According to McRay (2024), relying on a “non-attorney professional” is similar to receiving “self-help
assistance” (para. 3). Additionally, the approved resolution for revising the governing documents specifies
that the “ad hoc Revision Committee work with the association’s attorney to prepare revisions to the DKG

Collegial Exchange · 11