Page 23 - 2024_Jour_91-1
P. 23

Table 2
            Categories of Description

                                                         VALUES

             PRACTICAL                                              IDEALISTIC

             An Ordinary Person’s
             Good Life                       Getting Along                 Respect                 As Such

             Work                           Fairness, justice          Respect for others         Goodness
             Home                               Candor                     Honesty                  Truth

             Religion                          Tolerance                     Trust                  Beauty
             Fatherland                        Resilience                 Self-esteem

             Nature                             Courage                    Empathy

             Environment                     Responsibility                Optimism
             Rules                              Humor                Mental development

             Safety                           Creativeness          Emotional intelligence

             Leisure, culture

               The above rearrangement of values entices one to add a few nuances, such as
            Audi  (2007)  mentioning  that  values  cannot  be  seen  or  measured  quantitatively.
            Turunen (1992) would pick the values, at least those in the columns of Getting Along
            and Respect, and call them ideals, and in his classification (p. 22), goodness, truth
            and beauty are essential, traditional Platonic values, which can be pursued but not
            finally achieved.
               Considering the 226 responses to the questions regarding personal values (Tables
            1 and 2; Figure 3), Ronnow-Rasmussen (2011) added another type of personal value.
            He introduced the term vividly: When tidying his desk, he found a small poem written
            by his daughter years ago. He could not throw it away—it had some value for him.
            There is a distinction between value and value-for: a distinction between impersonal
            and personal value. For example, many people value wild nature or a just world.
            These facts or states of affair are just valuable, having no person-relative values.
            Ronnow-Rasmussen (2011) referred to an attitudinal rather than normative element
            when personal value is defined: a “for-someone’s-sake” (FSS) attitude is directed
            towards objects of personal value. Attitudes are not only desires or preferences but
            include “thicker” attitudes such as admiration, respect, and love. For example, the
            previously noted Getting Along and Respect are essentially several FSS attitudes.
               One  perhaps  unusual  response  was  Emotional  Intelligence—the  value
            conception chosen only by the mayor of the city. According to Goleman (1998), it is
            possible for anybody to learn practical skills based on five categories of emotional
            intelligence: self-knowledge, motivation, self-control, empathy, and taking care of
            social relationships. Emotional intelligence does not guarantee that one has learned
            the emotional skills needed at work; it might only indicate one’s chances of learning
            them. Goleman presents two types of emotional skills: personal and social.




            Promoting Professional and Personal Growth of Educators and Excellence in Education                21
   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28