Page 21 - 2022_Jour_89-1
P. 21

Conclusion
               Teachers have a unique opportunity to support the development of Indigenous
            students,  their  communities,  and  their  cultures  through  representation  in  the
            classroom. When representation of Indigenous perspectives exists, students can be
            exposed to primary source counter-narratives (Sanchez, 2007) that can help them
            to engage in authentic learning and act in critical thinking (Tipton, 2019). Differing
            perspectives will deteriorate the dominant narrative and remove outdated, inaccurate
            representations  of  Indigenous  peoples  (Miyamoto  et  al.,  2018),  normalizing  and
            valuing Indigenous peoples who thrive today. Inclusion will support social change
            and develop the learning process, offering greater value in education for all students
            (Nicholls, 2008) as well as supporting identity development in Indigenous students
            (Quinn, 2020).
               Teachers can support Indigenous students through strong, culturally supportive
            pedagogical practices by adhering to the framework provided and staying current
            on  trends  in  Indigenous  education.  These  actions  can  support  the  unlocking  of
            Indigenous students’ identity through empowerment, support, and acknowledgment.
            In these ways, teachers can help students associate with and reclaim their Indigenous
            identities one lesson at a time.

                                              References
            Abela, J., & Dague, C. T. (2020). Integrating transformational leadership to foster collaborative
                   classrooms. Critical Issues in Teacher Education, 27(1), 53–59.

            Adam, H. (2021). When authenticity goes missing: How monocultural children’s literature
                   is silencing the voices and contributing to the invisibility of children from minority
                   backgrounds. Education Sciences, 11(1), 32.

            Alfred, T., & Corntassel, J. (2005). Being Indigenous: Resurgences against contemporary
                   colonialism. Government and Opposition, 40(4), 597–614. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477
                   -7053.2005.00166.x
            Allen, D. (2021, March 2). Educating for American democracy: National forum [Conference
                   presentation]. Roadmap for Educating for American Democracy, Washington, DC.

            Andersen, C. (2015). Indigenous nationhood. In S. N. Teves, A. Smith, & M. Raheja (Eds.), Native
                   studies keywords (pp. 180–197). University of Arizona Press.

            Anderson, J., & Christen, K. (2019). Decolonizing attribution: Traditions of exclusion. Journal of
                   Radical Librarianship, 5, 113–152.

            Anyon, J. (1980). Social class and the hidden curriculum of work. Journal of Education, 162(1),
                   67–92. http://www.jeananyon.org/docs/anyon-1980.pdf

            Ault, P., & John, L. (2017, July 6). Obscured identities: Improving the accuracy of identification
                   of American Indian and Alaska native students. Education Northwest. https://
                   educationnorthwest.org/resources/obscured-identities-improving-accuracy-identification
                   -american-indian-and-alaska-native

            Bandura, A. (1986).  Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-
                   Hall.
            Battiste, M. (2017). The legacy of forced assimilative education in decolonizing education:
                   Nourishing the learning spirit. UBC Press.
            Bishop, R. S. (1990). Mirrors, windows, and sliding glass doors. Perspectives: Choosing and Using
                   Books for the Classroom, 6(3), ix–xi.


            Changing Perspectives on Teaching and Learning                                                     19
   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26